Rob Pincus

Accuracy is Yes or No

Rob Pincus
Duration:   3  mins

Description

In target shooting endeavors, “accuracy” has traditionally been viewed on a scale… a shot closer to the center of your target area has been considered “more accurate” than one near the edge. In defensive shooting, accuracy should be seen as a “yes” or “no” proposition: Either the bullet hit your intended target or it did not. If it did not, you can try to determine why, fix the problem and try again. If it did hit the target area, then you have achieved your goal. In defensive shooting, it is much more important to achieve your goal (i.e. hitting your target area) as quickly as possible than it is to obsess over hitting the center of your target area. Of course, defining your target area appropriately is important to the process as well. If you define your target area as an area the size of the center of the typical human chest, you are in the right ballpark for defensive shooting. When you shoot, if you hit that area, you are “accurate”… at that point, improving your skill means getting hits faster, with less effort, not hitting a smaller area.

Share tips, start a discussion or ask other students a question. If you have a question for the instructor, please click here.

Make a comment:
characters remaining

3 Responses to “Accuracy is Yes or No”

  1. Nathan

    This is why I love shooting at steel targets, it really is yes or no with an audible notification. Just order or make them your preferred size and go. I have seen people struggle with paper by focusing to much on the sights and then do really well after we move to steel.

  2. joseph

    Yeah I see it, accuracy is dependent on what you are trying to do. Byran P makes a good point. We always care how people are viewing us. Well I will make that a goal also, to not care at the indoor shooting range what someone else is doing, just me and what I am trying to accomplish.

  3. Bryan P

    This is something I find myself struggling with when I go to the range. Even though my shots are more than combat accurate, I feel myself getting frustrated because they aren't all in the requisite X/Center. Then the more frustrated I get, the more my fundamentals suffer. This is why I do not care for indoor shooting ranges with lanes. I inevitably start looking at how other people are shooting and comparing my target against theirs for that "perfect center" accuracy.

Here comes another important tip from the Personal Defense Network. Was that shot accurate or not? That's the most important question we can ask about a shot in a training environment. Accuracy needs to be thought of as yes or no. If the shot was accurate, I achieved my goal, I did what I wanted to do and I need to maybe change the parameters, change the level of precision, try to do it faster, try to do it from further away, try to do it in a more complex environment, I need to push myself. If the answer was no, if I wasn't accurate, then I need to change what I'm doing. I need to apply my fundamentals at a higher level, maybe I need to dramatically change the technique I'm using in order to achieve the goal of getting that bullet to go where I needed it to go. So in a training environment, the answer should be no every once in a while to let us see what we need to do, where we need to improve, we should always be pushing ourselves again. So was that shot accurate or was it not accurate? Well, if my goal was to get inside of the nine ring, which on this type of target is a good approximation of the area that we talked about when we talked about the high center chest, if my goal was to get inside of the nine ring, that shot was absolutely accurate. Now let's make it a little more complicated. That shot was just as accurate as the nine, the first time. This shot is also just as accurate. It's important to understand that those second and third shots are not only equal to the first shot, but they're also equal to one another in terms of accuracy. All three shots are accuracy, yes. Far too often in shooting world we obsess over the idea that that shot that cut into the X ring is somehow better than the shot that's in a nine ring. But we have to remember that once we've decided that anything inside of the nine ring is good, that that's our goal, then it's really about achieving that shot inside of the nine ring as quickly as we can with as little effort as we can, with as little energy as we can. That of course is efficiency. We wanna make sure that we're getting those hits quickly. Of course in a target shooting environment that X might be seen as better. But in the target shooting environment, we would probably start out by defining our goal not by getting inside of the nine ring, but by simply being inside of the X ring. In that case, if I'm gonna fire this next shot with the goal of being inside of the X ring, the answer is no. I'm way out on the edge of the nine, that shot barely meets our first criteria for accuracy. And of course if I go down here, that shot at the edge of the eight ring absolutely doesn't meet the criteria for accuracy on either level. When you get ready to shoot at a target make sure that you don't get fooled by the design of the target and pulled away from what your actual goal is. Understand that precision is the variable. Am I looking to get inside of the 9? Am I looking to get inside of the eight or is anything on the black acceptable? Once you set your level of precision, fire your shot and then ask yourself, accuracy yes or accuracy no. Be sure to check out the Personal Defense Network for more important tips just like that one.
Get exclusive premium content! Sign up for a membership now!